Outline: This course is based on selected topics in mechanism design and its relationship with areas like algorithms, optimization etc. These topics include cooperative games, stable matching, games on networks, potential games etc. This is a research-oriented course, hence students are expected to read and present cutting-edge research topics in this area, and also develop writing skills towards a formal technical report.
Pre-requisites: Familiarity with formal mathematical reasoning, probability theory, calculus, basics of computational complexity, and familiarity with computer programming. The course expects familiarity with game theoretic ideas and results – hence a course like CS698W or CS656 will be required.
First Course Handout (FCH): PDF
- Lecture-Scribe assignment is now available. Scribes will be updated at the beginning of the week.
- Problem set on bargaining (taken from Game Theory by Maschler et al.) — problems (15.) 10, 12, 13, 14, 16,17, 22, 23, 29.
- Problem set on TU games (taken from Game Theory by Maschler et al.) — problems (16.) 6, 7, 11, 12, 20, 21, 23.
- Problem set on Core (taken from Game Theory by Maschler et al.) — problems (17.) 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 28, 52.
- Some papers are suggested on Piazza for the project component of the course. They are indicative, however, you are free to choose project ideas of your own — see the course project section below.
- Project proposal submission deadline: February 28 (4 days after the last midterm exam) — submit a one-page summary of the plan you are planning to pursue. You may use the project submission template below.
- Project submission template: tex, pdf. Details are available in the pdf — keep your report limited to 10 pages in that format. The deadline for submission of the reports is April 21 (one day before the first day of end-sem exams).
- Problem set on Shapley value and nucleolus (taken from Game Theory by Maschler et al.) — problems (18.) 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 28, and 20.23.
Course policies are available in the FCH above.
Books & References
No specific textbook. The references and lecture notes of CS698W will be useful for the basics of game theory and mechanism design. Selected chapters from books and lecture notes that may be useful will be made available during the course. However the students may refer to the following books:
- Martin Osborne and Ariel Rubinstein: A course in game theory
- Y. Narahari: Game theory and mechanism design
- Roth and Sotomayor: Two sided matching – Econometric society monographs
- Maschler, M., Solan, E., & Zamir, S. (2013). Game Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Debasis Mishra
Game Theory course notes: http://www.isid.ac.in/~dmishra/gm1doc/notes_2016.pdf
Mechanism Design course notes: http://www.isid.ac.in/~dmishra/gmdoc/mdnotes.pdf
- Papers from conferences, e.g., (but not limited to) EC, WINE, AAAI, IJCAI, AAMAS, and journals, e.g., Econometrica, Journal of Economic Theory, Games and Economic Behavior etc.
[Will be updated as the classes go along. Disclaimer: these scribed lecture notes resulted from a compilation from multiple other sources, e.g., books and other lecture notes.]
Lecture 2: Introduction to cooperative game theory, correlated equilibrium, axiomatic bargaining. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 3: Axioms for bargaining, Nash bargaining theorem. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 4: Proof of Nash bargaining theorem. Extension for more than two players, limitations, Transferable Utility (TU) games. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 5: Solution concepts of TU games, the core, examples of cores, balanced collection of coalitions, balanced weights, the Bondareva-Shapley theorem. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 6: Proof of the Bondareva-Shapley theorem, examples of game classes with non-empty cores — market games, totally balanced games. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes] [linear programming duality intro]
Lecture 7: Consistency of set solution concepts of TU games– the Davis-Maschler reduced game property, applications to core, convex games with equivalent definition, non-emptiness of core of convex games. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 8: Single-valued solution concept, Shapley axioms, Shapley value. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 9: Proof of Shapley theorem, examples and applications, Shapley-Shubik power index, case study, Shapley value for convex games, consistency property — Hart-Mas-colell reduced game. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 10: Refinements of the core, nucleolus, its computation, compact representation of coalitional games, weighted graph games. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 11: Social choice and Gibbard-Satterthwaite result, one-sided matching, serial dictatorship, top-trading cycle mechanism. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Lecture 12: Analysis of top-trading cycle mechanism, stability, core, individual rationality, characterization of TTC, generalized TTC. [hwnotes] [scribed notes (draft)] [scribed notes]
Important: Lecture-Scribe assignment.
Since this is a research-focused course, the course project is extremely important for developing new ideas and transforming them into workable solutions. It is seen that in doing a project, where a learner is required to either code a system or prove a result independently, s/he learns very intricate details of an idea or concept. A course project can be (a) completely a theoretical development, (b) completely a real-world application development, or (c) a mix of the previous two. All topics has to have a significant game-theoretic/mechanism design component — however there is no restriction on what the application area may be. It is a good idea to keep looking for ideas when different topics are discussed in the class — and if you have an idea that may be converted into a project, come and talk to me. Deadline for submitting the project proposals will be announced later.
This semester we will be using Piazza for class discussion. The system is highly catered to getting you help fast and efficiently from classmates, the TA, and myself. Rather than emailing questions to the teaching staff, I encourage you to post your questions on Piazza.